UTILIZING RESULTS OF VARIOUS
BLOOD ALCOHOL DETERMINATION METHODOLOGIES
IN PREDICTING INTOXICATION

Max Courtney
Forensic Consultant Services
P.O. Box 11668
Fort Worth, TX 76110

  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Autoanalyzers
  • Potential Problems
  • Serum Conversion
  • Effect of Intravenous Fluids
  • Case Histories
  • Summary
  • Acknowledgement
  • References

    ABSTRACT

    Various methods of blood alcohol determination are described. Potential medicolegal problems with results from hospital laboratories are discussed. Several case studies involving determinations by more than one method are presented.

    INTRODUCTION

    Since the advent of the automobile, alcohol-impaired driving has been a traffic safety problem. Particularly since the 1930s law enforcement officials have sought reliable alcohol concentration tests for drivers suspected of intoxication. Various legislative entities have enacted statutes that define intoxication and, in some cases, specify rules for alcohol testing. The  test results are ostensibly directed toward prosecution of impaired drivers. While expediency of obtaining results certainly is a plus, the overriding need is for accurate results.

    With a somewhat different rationale medical professionals have developed methods for determination of alcohol in patients. The presence of significant amounts of alcohol in patients can cause problems in two ways. First, alcohol intoxication can mimic symptoms of other maladies. Secondly, medication or treatment decisions might depend upon the patient's alcohol concentration. Emergency room decisions sometimes must be made quickly; hence, the need for test methods in which results are obtained quickly.

    Arguably, the different needs lead to different philosophies. While justice is slow and deliberate, emergency medicine is "STAT". An alcohol concentration of 0.080 gram per deciliter is on the cusp of statutory definitions of intoxication in many jurisdictions. The accuracy of such a result is necessarily of great moment. On the other hand, a treating physician would have no need for concern as to whether a patient's result is 0.07, 0.08 or 0.09 gram per deciliter, since the obvious diagnostic or treatment implications are not impacted by such a trivial difference.

    Many of the earlier chemical tests of blood for alcohol content relied upon colorimetric determinations. By several methods, the alcohol in a blood sample was distilled, and the distillate was oxidized with various oxidizing reagents. The reagents were colored compounds, so that their disappearance could be measured with a colorimeter. The methods were tedious and laborious. Accuracy was largely dependent upon technique.

    Currently most forensic blood alcohol determinations are done by gas chromatographic analysis. The most commonly employed methods rely upon injection of a heated head space sample. Most analysts will use an appropriate internal standard to minimize  errors, especially injection errors. Depending upon the laboratory, the testing might be highly automated or might still require numerous manipulations of the samples.

    Most alcohol testing in hospital laboratories is performed on autoanalyzers. A blood alcohol test generally is done as one in a battery of tests initiated simultaneously. The various testing methods employed all use an enzymatic oxidation of alcohol followed by a colorimetric determination. The testing is essentially automatic, with little reliance upon technique.

    Since hospital lab testing is done for medical purposes, no real need exists for evidential safeguards that obviously are necessary in forensic testing. For example, no attempt will be made generally to document the chain of custody of a blood sample. The record may (or may not) indicate precisely who drew the sample, when it was drawn, from which body site it was drawn, and into which type of sample tube it was collected. Many hospitals do not keep blood samples past a few days, so no retesting would be possible.

    AUTOANALYZERS

    The typical hospital laboratory runs numerous tests on blood and other body fluids in the course of diagnosis and treatment. A panel on a single patient may feature 20 or 30 tests, and these may be repeated several times a day. Obviously, automation is desirable.

    The Johnson & Johnson "Vitros" and the Abbott "Axsym" are examples of such autoanalyzers. In addition to alcohol determinations, they are used for numerous other tests. The sample typically is prepared by drawing a patient's blood sample into a serum tube, such as a "tiger-top" tube. The specimen is centrifuged to maximize separation of the serum from the erythrocytes. The uncapped sample tube is placed into the sample tray. The operator inputs, through a keyboard, the slot number, sample number, and the desired tests to be run, and the analyzer performs the requested tests and prints the results.

    Chemistry. The Vitros and Axsym analyzers both run an "enzymatic" alcohol determination. The Vitros measurement relies upon oxidation of ethanol by the coenzyme nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) in the presence of alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH). The reaction products are acetaldehyde and the reduced NADH. The acetaldehyde is trapped by a buffer, tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (TRIS). The alcohol concentration is determined spectrophotometrically by measuring the increase in NADH concentration. The Axsym analyzer utilizes the same first step but then reacts the NADH with a monotetrazolium dye in the presence of diaphorase. The assay is based on Radiative Energy Attenuation (REA). With the Axsym,  whole blood can be run if different reagents are used.

    Procedure. The Vitros analyzer pipets a 10-microliter drop of serum onto a test slide, which is a multilayered element coated on a polyester support.  The slide contains the NAD, TRIS, and ADH. The slide is incubated at 37 degrees for 5 minutes and then read spectrophotometrically. Appropriate controls and known values are run at specified intervals. The Axsym instrument autopipets an aliquot of sample-reagent mixture to a cuvette, and fluorescence changes are measured and compared against a calibration curve.

    Reporting. The results are printed at the instrument and reviewed by the operator. Typically, the results are sent by computer to the patient floors where they are printed out in their final form. The printed results generated at the instrument may not be maintained.

    Range of Tested Values. Values between 10 and 300 milligrams per deciliter (0.010 to 0.300 g/dL) are reportable on the Vitros analyzer and between 13 and 300 mg/dL on the Axsym. Values less than 10 (13) mg/dL are considered insignificant. Values greater than 300 mg/dL may be diluted and rerun.

    Specificity. Some alcohols may cross-react with the reagents. Acetaldehyde, acetone, and methanol do not significantly interfere. On the Vitros, isopropyl alcohol at a concentration of 0.200 g/dL shows an apparent alcohol concentration of 0.020 g/dL. The Axsym gives a result of less than 0.005 g/dL with isopropyl alcohol at a concentration of 1.000 g/dL. Postmortem and immediately antemortem specimens might show erroneously high ethanol results because of extremely high levels of lactate dehydrogenase and lactate. On the Axsym analyzer, a lactic acid concentration of 270 mg/dL gave errors of less than 10%. No comparable data were reported on the Vitros analyzer.

    Precision. When multiple replications were performed, a standard deviation of 0.0017 g/dL was obtained with the Vitros analyzer on specimens with mean alcohol concentration of 0.086 g/dL, and a standard deviation of 0.0043 g/dL was obtained with specimens with mean alcohol concentration of 0.195 g/dL. Values with the Axsym reflect a standard deviation of 0.00168 g/dL for 0.050 g/dL solutions and 0.00960 g/dL for 0.250 g/dL solutions.

    Accuracy. When the results were compared with results obtained by head-space gas chromatography, a correlation coefficient of 0.990 was obtained with the Vitros. The correlation value for the Axsym analyzer was 0.994.


    POTENTIAL PROBLEMS

    Because hospital lab methods are rightly designed for medical purposes, problems might arise when the results are used for medicolegal purposes (which is no reflection on those hospital labs). Problems have been noted by the author in numerous cases involving different labs. Of course, not all problems would necessarily apply to all hospitals.

    First, the testing protocols do not take into account the potential for cross-examination. Typically, no chain of custody is established to document all of the details about the drawing, transporting, storage, and other information. The samples are discarded after a short time period, so that no retesting is possible.

    Secondly, operators might, if testifying, show a very limited knowledge of the operational theory of the analyzer. Their training generally is operational, rather than technical. The training seems to be oriented more toward results than to details of methodology.

    Thirdly, sample drawing is not uniform. The specimen might be drawn by a nurse, a phlebotomist, or a lab technician. Draw sites might not be documented. The type of disinfectant used might not be documented. In the experience of the author, the blood drawing is sometimes done after an alcohol swab has been used to cleanse the venipuncture site, even though the published methodologies state unequivocally that a water-based solution should be used.

    Also, the results typically would be sent by computer network to patient floors. Some hospital labs do not keep the original printouts. The typical file copy that is available for review will show only the time, the result, and perhaps the results of reference analyses.

    Finally, some hospital blood alcohol reports have somewhat of a disclaimer printed on their faces. Such a report might include a statement that alcohol for forensic purposes should be done by gas chromatographic analysis. While the statement wouldn't necessarily preclude a forensic interpretation of the results, it certainly gives an attorney who is challenging the result or its admission a point of argument.

    SERUM CONVERSION

    Since most hospital labs analyze serum, the results must somehow be converted to a whole-blood equivalent for medicolegal purposes. One method for conversion is approximation by using an average value for the serum:blood ratio. One study reported the ratio to range from 1.04 to 1.26, with a mean value of 1.14. The author uses a value of 1.16; hence, a serum result of 0.226 g/dL would result in a whole-blood value of 0.195 g/dL. Other authorities might use slightly different values for the blood:serum ratio. Use of an assumed 1:1.14 ratio in the above example gives a similar result of 0.198 g/dL, an insignificant difference.

    Other toxicologists prefer to calculate a whole-blood equivalent value based upon the hematocrit.  The hematocrit is the ratio of the height of red blood cells to the height of the fluid after the blood is centrifuged. Since the clear liquid above the cells is the serum being analyzed, the ratio, which varies, would obviously affect the serum:blood ratio. The normal hematocrit value range varies (42.0 to 52.0 for males and 37.0 to 47.0 for females). However, it has been noted that the typical hospital laboratory reports a hematocrit value that has been calculated from other data, rather than a measured value. The reported hematocrit is a value derived from the product of the red blood count times one-tenth the mean corpuscular volume.

    EFFECT OF INTRAVENOUS FLUIDS

    In most cases involving hospital analysis of blood specimens, the patient is in the hospital for treatment of injuries. In those cases, it is usual for the patient to have received one or more intravenous solutions. Since nonalcoholic liquid is being added to the body, the patient's alcohol concentration obviously will be affected to some degree. Considering the relatively small amount of fluid added compared to the mean distribution volume, the effects are minimal. However, cases have been noted wherein the patient was receiving an intravenous infusion simultaneously with the drawing of blood from the same arm. The axiom to "Draw below the infusion site," would tend to minimize the dilution of blood, but this discipline is not always practiced  religiously. If blood is drawn downstream from the infusion site, a significant dilution of the blood seems an obvious conclusion. In such a case, the effect could not be quantitated. Conversely, infusion with Ringer's Lactate solution (310 mg/dL sodium lactate) introduces sodium lactate into the blood, which arguably could somewhat elevate a result obtained by enzymatic analysis.

    CASE HISTORIES

    The author has examined data from a number of cases involving blood alcohol test results from both hospital labs and forensic labs. In many cases the results fit tightly, but problems surface in some. One case showing the general agreement of data is presented, followed by two cases that pose some interesting questions.

    Case 1.  After an accident at 0121 hours, a blood specimen was drawn at about 0200 hours and analyzed by enzymatic analysis of serum. The result was 227 mg/dL (autoanalyzer unspecified). The hematocrit was calculated to be 41.5%. Prior to arrival, the suspect received a Lactated Ringer's infusion in the left arm at 0145 hours (slow rate) and a second Ringer's in the right arm at 0150 hours (wide open). A sample was drawn at the request of a peace officer at 0325 hours. Subsequent analysis by gas chromatographic analysis revealed an alcohol concentration of 0.16 g/dL. A search of the suspect's truck was conducted several days later; a 12-pack cardboard beer package and an ice chest were found. Conversion of the serum alcohol concentration using a 1:1.16 ratio and truncation gives a whole blood equivalent value of 0.19 g/dL. The two values, 0.19 and 0.16 g/dL, are for samples taken approximately 1.5 hours apart. This is consistent with a subject in a post-absorptive state who is eliminating alcohol at a reasonable rate of 0.020 g/dL/hour.

    Case 2. A blood sample was drawn from a suspect at 0600 hours, following an accident that occurred at 0425 hours; the phlebotomist used isopropyl alcohol disinfectant. The reported result of an enzymatic serum analysis on an Axsym autoanalyzer was 116 mg/dL. A second specimen was drawn at 0803 hours, again with isopropyl alcohol disinfectant. The result of the second Axsym analysis was 57 mg/dL. A third specimen was drawn at 0805 hours, and that time a povidine swab was used. The results by gas chromatographic analysis of whole blood were 0.0379 and 0.0368 g/dL, which were reported as 0.03 g/dL. According to additional data provided, the suspect was infused with most of a 1L bag of Lactated Ringer's solution; all blood sample draws and the intravenous infusion were believed to be in the left arm (the right arm was broken). A calculated hematocrit at 0555 hours was 43.1%. Some empty beer cans were found strewn about the scene, but conclusive evidence of an open container was absent. The fact that alcohol swabs were used for the first two specimens certainly clouds the issue of alcohol concentration. Conversion to whole blood equivalents using a ratio of 1:1.16 gives 0.100 and 0.049 g/dL for samples taken two hours apart. This would predict an elimination rate of 0.025  g/dL/hour. However, comparison of the second and third specimens, taken almost simultaneously, shows a difference of 0.012 g/dL. If the first and third results are compared (0.100 and  0.037  g/dL), the predicted elimination rate becomes 0.031 g/dL/hour. The hematocrit value, 43.1% at 0555 hours, is in the normal range; thus blood dilution at that time is not suggested. As a further trial complication, a defense expert testified that infusion of the patient with Ringer's Lactate solution would elevate the lactate concentration to such a high level that the enzymatic alcohol analysis would be meaningless.

    Case 3. After an accident at 0234 hours, a blood specimen was drawn at 0411 (or 0400) hours for medical purposes. Enzymatic analysis (autoanalyzer unspecified) revealed an alcohol concentration of 51.1 mg/dL. A mandatory blood specimen was drawn for law enforcement purposes at 0431 hours. Subsequent analysis by gas chromatographic analysis produced a result of 0.08 g/dL. No records were provided as to intravenous solutions prior to arrival. The medical records indicate that the suspect received a Lactated Ringer's infusion in the left arm (wide open) at 0338 hours, a normal saline in the right arm at 0342 hours (wide open), an additional Lactated Ringer's at 0405 hours (wide open, infusion site not recorded), and an additional normal saline at 0412 (wide open, site not recorded). No hematocrit result was available. No open container was found in the suspect's vehicle.


    SUMMARY

    Analysis of serum samples for ethyl alcohol in hospital laboratories is a fast, acceptably accurate method for determining the medical condition of patients and their suitability for certain treatments or medications. Probably the biggest drawback in using them for medicolegal applications, particularly in criminal matters, is establishing prove-up in court. The possible  lack of a chain of custody for the sample, lack of recorded and detailed information about the blood drawing and analysis, the non-availability of a sample for retesting, and the possible lack of original data can cause problems in getting the results before the jury.

    However, the tested accuracy, precision, and specificity of enzymatic methods seems scientifically suitable in providing a serum alcohol concentration result in a properly conducted test. In numerous cases, as well as referee laboratory testing, the results have been found to be generally consistent with those obtained by gas chromatographic analysis.

    Obviously, the results of gas chromatographic analysis of whole blood in cases where a chain of custody is established and the sample is available for retesting are preferable. Scientists who depend upon the results of hospital lab results for medicolegal purposes should be aware of problem areas and limitations. Certainly, all of the data concerning the patient should be considered before conclusions are reached.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

    The author notes with appreciation the helpfulness of Donna Evans and Ken Steelman of Texoma Memorial Hospital Laboratory in Denison, Texas.

    REFERENCES

    1. "Test Methodology, Vitros ALC Slides," Johnson & Johnson Clinical Diagnostics, 1996.
    2. "REA Ethanol," Abbott Laboratories, 1997.
    3. Personal interview, Larry "Ken" Steelman, Texoma Memorial Hospital Laboratory, Denison, Texas, 2002.
    4. Charlebois, R. C., Corbett, M. R., and Wigmore, J. G., "Comparison of Ethanol Concentrations in Blood, Serum, and Blood Cells for Forensic Application," J. Anal. Tox., 20, p. 171, 1996.
    5. Personal interview, Eb Foerster, Southwestern Institute of Forensic Sciences, Dallas, Texas (retired), 1997.
    6. Personal interview, Donna Evans, Texoma Memorial Hospital Laboratory, Denison, Texas, 2002.
    7. Investigative and medical records from Grayson County, Texas, Attorney, 2002.
    8. Investigative and medical records from Matagorda County, Texas, District Attorney, 2001.
    9. Investigative and medical records from Ellis County, Texas, District Attorney, 1996.

    GLOSSARY OF TERMS
    FOUND IN EMERGENCY ROOM NOTES


    Note: This list is not all-inclusive. Terms may vary from one hospital to another. Context is important in understanding the notes.

    TERM MEANING
    BP Blood pressure
    CBC Complete blood count
    FX Fracture
    GCS Glascow trauma scale (used in triage)
    HCT Hematocrit (height per cent of red blood cells in centrifuged sample)
    HEENT Head, eyes, ears, nose, and throat (exam results)
    IV Intravenous solution
    LAC Left antecubital fossa (common site of blood draws and iv needles)
    LR (Also RL) Lactated Ringer's intravenous solution (310 mg/dL sodium lactate, anhydrous, 600 mg/dL sodium chloride, 30 mg/dL potassium chloride, and 20 mg/dL calcium chloride, dihydrate)
    MVA Motor vehicle accident
    NKA No known allergies
    NKDA No known drug allergies
    NS Normal saline intravenous solution (0.85% sodium chloride)
    PT Patient
    PTA Prior to arrival (refers to what EMTs have done)
    RAC Right antecubital fossa (common site of blood draws and iv needles)
    RBC Red blood count
    WO Wide open (rate of infusion for iv solution, as opposed to "X" cc/min)
    18GA 18-gauge (size of commonly used needle for iv infusion